By Taylor Armerding
The Hendricks County Flyer
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 02:51 PM EDT
I can't count the number of times I've heard President Obama say he wants to make sure we live in a society where, "everybody plays by the same set of rules."
If he really means that, he should probably resign before Election Day and let voters decide if they want to put crazy old Uncle Joe in the White House. Because the president is all about the opposite - demanding different sets of rules for different groups of people.
Start with his most famous meme - that millionaires and billionaires pay income taxes "at a lower rate than their secretaries" because they get to play by a different set of rules.
Indeed, in this past week's debate, he said it again - that his Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, "has a one-point plan. And that plan is to make sure that folks at the top play by a different set of rules."
That's false, and he knows it. Yes, as that allegedly "patriotic billionaire" Warren Buffett has pointed out, his secretary pays a higher percentage of her income in taxes than he does. But that is not because they are playing by a different set of rules.
In this case, the rule is that investment income is taxed at a lower rate than earned income. That rule has been endorsed by both Democrats and Republicans, largely for two reasons: Investment income has already been taxed once as earned income, so the government's total take on it is something north of 40 percent; and elected officials want to offer incentives to encourage investment, because it helps the economy grow.
That rule applies equally to Buffett and his secretary.
Ah, but the "problem," according to Obama, is that a lot more of Buffett's income (and that of Romney) is from investments, while that of most middle- and lower-income people is earned, and therefore taxed at a higher rate.
Is that unfair? If it is, then it is arguably unfair for anyone to make more money than anyone else. Or, perhaps the president thinks it is unfair for anybody to make income from investments. If the rule is unfair, and the president really wants everybody to "play by the same set of rules, then he and Congress could change it for everybody, and tax all investment at 28 percent, 35 percent, 90 percent - whatever.
But that is not what Obama wants to do. He wants to tax investment income at a lower rate for people making less than $200,000 (above which, in the president's fantasy world, you become a "millionaire") and tax it at a higher rate for incomes above that.
Bottom line: Obama doesn't want everybody to play by the same set of rules, because he doesn't like the results.
The same is true in multiple other cases. Those employed by government at all levels get better pay, much better benefits - health care, vacation, personal time, overtime - and vastly better pensions than their average counterpart in the private sector. In most cases they can retire with that pension after 30 years or less, instead of the usual 40 to 45 years in the private sector.
Obama has never objected to one of his favored constituencies playing by a different set of rules than the rest of us.
The same was true of the government bailout of General Motors. Obama, who regularly applauds himself for "betting on American workers" (with your money) forced bondholders to play by a different set of rules than the unions, so he could reward his friends in organized labor and leave the rest who, if the "same set of rules" had been followed, would not have been forced to take a much bigger haircut.
Affirmative action is a major set of different rules for different people. There are substantive arguments on both sides about whether it is still useful and necessary to maintain and promote diversity and opportunity for minorities, but that is not the issue here. The issue is that the president does not want everybody to play by the same set of rules.
The president wants different rules for oil companies than for other energy companies. He, his surrogates, and virtually every Democrat on the planet bash "tax breaks for Big Oil." But they rarely provide any detail or context.
That's because eliminating that allegedly colossal subsidy would, by Obama's own account, bring in only $25 billion over 10 years. That's an average of $2.5 billion per year - not even a rounding error in a federal budget of $1.6 trillion. It would do zilch to address the nation's deficit or long-term debt in what the president is so fond of calling, "a balanced way."
Meanwhile, the Exxon, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips paid an estimated $55 billion in taxes in 2011, at rates ranging from 41.5 percent to 48.3 percent.
Sure, the oil companies are profitable and have a lot left over. But they are not even close to playing by the same set of rules granted to those in the allegedly glorious green energy field.
The list could go on. The president can continue to make the case that a society where success is punished and failure is rewarded is a much healthier one. But don't call it playing by the same set of rules. That is absurd.
- Taylor Armerding is an independent columnist. Contact him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
March 3, 2014
February 27, 2014
February 26, 2014
There was a wide array of reactions to Seattle DB Richard Sherman’s post-game “interview” with Erin Andrews following the Seahawks’ NFC title win over San Francisco.
Mine? Laughter, as the shout-down was the most entertaining thing I saw all day.
January 28, 2014
Butler is still a long way from saving its 2013-14 men’s basketball season, but if the Bulldogs turn it around fully and reach the NCAA Tournament, it will have started this past Saturday at Hinkle Fieldhouse.
January 21, 2014
A fine season for the Indianapolis Colts ended with a whimper Saturday at New England, but in recent team history, it was far from the most disappointing postseason defeat.
January 14, 2014
The Indianapolis Colts’ miraculous 45-44 wild card victory over Kansas City on Saturday ended just after 8 p.m. After leaving Lucas Oil Stadium, it took until around midnight for the pounding in my head to subside.
January 7, 2014
December 31, 2013
An NPR broadcast examines the question of how communities can better prepare for tornadoes like the one that struck Moore, Okla. on Monday. The broadcast features commentary from Michael Fitzgerald, who reported a five-part disaster series for the CNHI News Service.
May 22, 2013
Part I: Are We Prepared? | Part II: Disaster Dollars Part III: Lessons Learned | Part IV: Warning Signs Part V: The Big One
Sigma Alpha Epsilon, one of the largest U.S. fraternities and the deadliest, said Friday it will ban the initiation of recruits, citing the toll that hazing has taken on its newest members.
March 7, 2014
© 2014 Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc. ·
CNHI Classified Advertising Network ·
CNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2014. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope. Some parts of our site may require
you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
Terms and Conditions
Hendricks County Flyer, Avon, IN
8109 Kingston St., Suite 500